I'm not technical. Is that a problem?
It's the assumption. The call is about your work, not your
systems — what takes too long, what you do every Tuesday, what
you'd hand off first if you could. Translating that into tools is
our end of the deal, and the report is written to be read by you,
not forwarded to someone technical.
I've already tried a few AI tools. Is this still for me?
Yes, and it makes the audit easier — you already know what didn't
stick, which is genuinely useful information. We'll tell you
what's worth keeping, what to drop, and what you walked past.
Most people we talk to are starting from zero, but plenty aren't.
What if you don't find anything worth doing?
Then you don't pay — that's the guarantee. Sometimes the honest
answer is "you're already fine," and we'd rather say it than
invoice you for a list of things you don't need.
Do you make money on the tools you recommend?
No. We take no commission, referral fee, or kickback from
anything in the report. If the right answer is a $30/month
off-the-shelf tool, that's what it will say — even though there's
no implementation work in it for us.
Do I have to buy the implementation too?
No. The audit is deliberately complete on its own, and plenty of
people take the report and do it themselves. If you'd rather we
set it up, we'll quote it in writing. That's a separate decision,
made after you've seen the report.
Will AI replace my staff?
That's not what this is. Nearly everything we recommend takes
admin off people who'd rather be doing the actual work — the
quoting, the chasing, the copying between systems. If a
recommendation would put someone out of a job, we'll say so
plainly and let you decide.